Skip to content
Technical Proposal
AI Evaluation Agents

Three expert reviewers read your proposal like a Saudi procurement committee

Legal, business, and technical AI reviewers score your proposal before you submit on Etimad or Forsah — and turn every gap into a one-click rewrite.

No credit card required · Report ready in under two minutes

Market leaders across Saudi Arabia, in every sector, trust TendersAlerts

Three agents. Three review angles.

Each agent runs a weighted rubric inspired by Saudi procurement committee practice and returns a 0–100 score plus structured strengths, gaps, and recommendations.

Legal Reviewer

Reads your proposal against Saudi procurement law and the tender's mandatory eligibility, compliance, and contractual terms.

Surfaces regulatory and contractual gaps before the agency's evaluation committee does.

Weight
  • Regulatory & Saudi procurement law compliance30%
  • Tender requirements & eligibility25%
  • Contractual terms, warranties & SLAs20%
  • Liability, indemnity & risk allocation15%
  • IP & data protection10%

Business Reviewer

Pressure-tests your commercial story: pricing, governance, schedule, team, and risk.

Checks pricing competitiveness, schedule realism, and team strength so your bid is commercially convincing.

Weight
  • Commercial value & price competitiveness25%
  • Project management approach & governance25%
  • Schedule realism & milestones20%
  • Team capability & experience20%
  • Risk management & stakeholder plan10%

Technical Reviewer

Audits the solution itself — does the architecture, methodology, and quality story actually meet the scope?

Inspects fit-to-scope, standards, security and quality, and surfaces innovation that sets your bid apart.

Weight
  • Technical solution fit to scope30%
  • Architecture, methodology & standards25%
  • Security, privacy & reliability20%
  • Deliverables & QA15%
  • Innovation & differentiators10%

Every agent returns a 0–100 score plus a structured list of strengths, gaps, red flags, and recommendations — every issue mapped to the exact section it lives in.

They don't just grade

Every gap comes with a fix

A generic AI checker tells you something's wrong. Our agents write the fix and drop it into the right place in your proposal.

Quick Apply patch

A precise excerpt-level rewrite of an existing section, shown side-by-side as Current vs. Proposed. One click drops the improved text into your proposal.

Add a new section

When something required is missing, the agent drafts the whole section, ready to insert into your proposal structure.

Inside the editor, findings appear as inline annotations on the section they belong to (e.g. a “3 open findings” pill on the Scope section) so you can review, accept, or edit each suggestion without leaving the editor.

A live example

This is what a fix looks like

A real finding on the Scope section, with a side-by-side Current vs. Proposed diff and a one-click Apply.

High priorityScope section
Quick Apply

Deliverables aren't measurable

The current scope language is generic and doesn't tie deliverables to measurable KPIs, weakening your position with the evaluation committee.

Current

The supplier will deliver the project in line with the requirements and submit deliverables on time and at the highest quality.

Proposed

The supplier will deliver: (1) a production-ready platform within 12 weeks with full technical documentation, (2) a minimum 99.5% availability during the first operational quarter, and (3) onboarding for 8 key users, evidenced by signed completion certificates.

Two ways to use it

Whether you draft inside Technical Proposal or somewhere else, the evaluation agents are at your service.

Inside the editor

Built into the proposal editor

Once your proposal has at least four sections, run an evaluation from the Evaluation tab. You get an overall score, three agent scores, and a section-by-section findings list — with one-click fixes wired straight into the section you're editing.

  • Findings pinned to each section
  • Apply fixes without leaving the editor
  • Re-run evaluation after every revision
Standalone Quick Evaluate

Already have a proposal? Audit it now

For teams who write proposals in their own tooling but still need an expert second opinion. Bring the document, pick the tender, get the full report.

  1. 1
    Bring your proposal

    Paste the text or upload PDF / DOCX / TXT — we parse it into sections automatically.

  2. 2
    Pick the tender

    Search our Saudi tenders database, paste the tender text, or run against a generic Saudi procurement rubric.

  3. 3
    Get the full report

    Overall score, three agent scores, findings grouped by section, and every fix downloadable or copy-pastable.

Three steps from upload to a better proposal

No setup. Your proposal is reviewed in under two minutes.

  1. 1

    Upload

    Paste text or upload Word, PDF, or TXT.

  2. 2

    Evaluate

    Three agents review in parallel and finish in seconds.

  3. 3

    Apply fixes

    Drop improved text in place with one click.

Transparent pricing that scales with you

Start free and pay only when you need more. All plans are billed in Saudi Riyal — choose monthly or yearly.

Most popular

Pro

For small teams handling a high volume of tenders

550SAR/ mo

 

  • 15 Proposals
  • 1,000 Tender views
  • 750 AI chat messages
  • 500 AI tender analyses
  • 150 Multi-agent reviews
  • Unlimited AI-generated sections

Run your proposal past a virtual committee — before the real one

Create a free account and run your first evaluation in minutes. No credit card required.